Counsellor Aleph
was advised that the builder’s lawyer meets with silence (does not even provide
with explanation on why information is withhold) my repeated requests to
provide drawings, and formulas for net/gross calculatios. Among other proofs, Councillor
Aleph was also given this proof:
From: <ME>
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:22 AM
To: <Councilor Aleph>
Subject: <Lawyers>
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 10:22 AM
To: <Councilor Aleph>
Subject: <Lawyers>
***
***”
In the same letter, the counsellor Aleph
of LSUC was asked to provide “explanations to “Violations I request to be
explained”:
“ ***
Violations I request to be explained:
***
<LAWYER NAME
REMOVED> Facilitates dishonestly. <LAWYER
NAME REMOVED> repeatedly meets with silence my (and my lawyers) emails
to provide with drawings and formulas. I do not know why my unit is only 0.55%
of what I was sold and I have a right no know. ***”
Furthermore, I gave councillor Aleph of
LSUC following references to the code of professional conduct relating to not
replying to my unanswered enquires:
Nevertheless, counselor Aleph has closed (link to the closed complaints will be uploaded) all of
my complaints without explaining this alleged violation.
From: <ME>
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 4:14 PM
To: <Counselor Aleph, Manager>
Subject: FW: SOY
To: <Counselor Aleph, Manager>
Subject: FW: SOY
So, <Counselor Aleph, and his Manager>, can you kindly remind me why am I not getting the net/gross
calculation from the builders lawyers?
Did I mention to you that
according to your regulations the lawyers from both sides should be vigilant to
red flags which may relate to manipulation of the purchase prices?
Please read the email down below.
So<Counselor Aleph, Manager>you still see no “reasonable
suspicion of professional misconduct” ???
No comments:
Post a Comment